Quality Inn in Monroe Quality Performance of the Week

View Comments

• Coachtom48160 you sound like the typical problem with our teachers and world today. Nobody can be a winner without diminishing someone else's efforts. Guess what in the real world and on the field one wins and the the others don't. The fans are voting, having played college athletics I can tell you you don't have to have the best stats to make the biggest contribution, the lineman that recovers the key fumble, the special team guy that covers the onside kick, the O line that makes holes for those backs to get those yards.i think it's hilarious that you are a coach that has a problem with a winner. I have a participation trophy for you that I will hand to you only after I use hand sanitizer, I will ride it over to you on my bike with a helmet on.

• Riverview Offensive Line should be nominated for players of the week.

• Keep in mind, folks, that other sites do similar things for similar purposes (cough, cough, http://www.mlive.com/sports/ann-arbor/index.ssf/2017/09/who_was_ann_arbor-area_high_sc.html).

  If this weekly vote can drive more traffic to the site, along with bringing a few new sane voices to these discussions, that's fine by me.

  There's not a lot of upside to Chris and Gary crowning a weekly "winner" as that seems to officially minimize the contributions of other worthy players that week. To their credit, they also open up the nomination process to us knuckleheads, in case they missed someone deserving credit.

  As for the actual voting, though, although I participated in the voting I take the results with a grain of salt. Are any of you familiar with a baby contest? Now *that* is nowhere close to a meritocracy, that's for sure.

• Tristen Hines

• Tristen Hines

• Tristen Hines

• Mike Foor

• Hines is hands down more deserving of player of the week than anyone else on her the he scored over Hal of the big reds points against cc w out him maybe they don't win

• Why not just chose a couple kids a week who you think are deserving of "player of the week" and eliminate the voting? I know you want to include the participation of all of us but at the same time it is just a popularity contest. In my opinion what you guys are doing is awesome, just eliminate the voting so there isn't just one winner (who may or may not have the best stats), but instead just have five winners of "player of the week".

• People that don't even know your website or what it's even about. It's neighbors and co-workers of parents. I agree with you, recognize the performers, but you guys make the selection just as you do with the game oicks. You're right, you will always take some flack, but you guys are the experts. Just my 2 cents.